What examiners look for
Read your department's handbook and marking scheme first. This structure fits most engineering, computing and applied projects.
Chapter by chapter
Each chapter answers a question the examiner will ask in the viva or presentation anyway.
| Chapter | Examiner's question |
|---|---|
| Introduction | What problem did you take on, and what were your objectives? |
| Background | What exists already, and why isn't it enough? |
| Requirements or specification | What exactly did the solution have to do? |
| Design | What did you decide to build, and why that way? |
| Implementation | How did you build it, and what was hard? |
| Testing and evaluation | Does it meet the objectives? How do you know? |
| Conclusion and future work | What did you achieve, and what would come next? |
| Reflection | What did you learn, and what would you do differently? |
Justify, don't just describe
For each major decision, name the options you considered, the criteria you used and why the chosen option won. A short comparison table often does this well.
Examiners give more credit for a modest design that is well reasoned than for an ambitious one that is only described.
Evaluate honestly
Go back to your objectives and report against each: met, partly met or not met, with evidence such as test results, measurements or user feedback. Describe the test method so the result is believable.
Things that failed are worth marks if you can explain why. An evaluation that reports no problems is not credible.
Team reports and individual contribution
Agree terminology, tense and formatting before writing, and give one person the job of the final edit. Many courses require a statement of who did what, or an individual reflection alongside the group report; be accurate, since supervisors usually know.
Check your course's rules on AI tools as a team, and declare any use the way the course asks.
What goes in appendices
Full code listings, raw test data, questionnaires, meeting logs and user manuals belong in appendices or a repository, with the main text referring to them. Keep the body for explanation and evidence.